Video

Financial flexibility for all cities

The Cities Manifesto outlines Centre for Cities’ policy recommendations to the political parties in the run-up to the May 2010 General Election. We will be revisiting our Manifesto proposals over the autumn party conference season to assess what progress has been made by the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition.
See the Centre for Cities’ main website for our latest research and comment.

Spring 2010

Britain has emerged from recession – but only just. The recovery will be slow and uneven. Cities Outlook 2010, our annual index of urban economies, gave a stark picture of the widening gap between Britain’s cities. Since the recession began, the difference between the two cities with the highest and lowest shares of residents claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance – Hull and Cambridge – has nearly doubled.

We think the next Government needs urban policies which address the different needs of the UK’s biggest cities (like Greater London and the City Regions of Manchester, Birmingham, and Leeds), our struggling cities (such as Doncaster, Stoke and Barnsley) and buoyant cities (such as Cambridge, Reading, Milton Keynes and Brighton). Our Manifesto sets out what these policies might look like.

Our main finding is that cities need to be given more freedom over their economic future, and the financial flexibility to make their own decisions. The UK is over-centralised compared to other developed countries. Local Government accounts for 26% of Government expenditure, but in the UK, only 17% of finance is locally raised. The average for the OECD is 55%. More financial freedom would give cities the incentives to create the conditions for businesses to grow and create jobs, and to improve public spending efficiency. Relocalising the business rate should be the first step.

The Government should then set out a roadmap for further financing reforms. Progress on the roadmap, towards a more local balance of funding, should be reported to Parliament each year. Some level of equalisation would need to continue to occur, particularly to take into account the high tax take in the City of London and Westminster, and the Revenue Support Grant would also need to be reformed.

Reactions

Jim Hancock, Municipal Journal (& former BBC NW Political Editor)

Simon Fanshawe, Brighton & Hove Economic Partnership

Sir Howard Bernstein, Manchester City Council

Steve Norris

Angie Robinson, Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce

Ken Livingstone

Newcastle Leader John Shipley OBE

Tony Travers, LSE

Simply click on any of the thumbnails below to view some more manifesto reactions

Dermot's blog

more No feed items.

Recent Comments:

harry stewart:
I do not agree with the idea of an elected Mayor for Merseyside ,Wirral, St Helens and Sefton do not want to be part of Liverpool City Region these... Read More

Our Policies

Metro Mayors for Britain's largest city regions
THE UK's MAJOR CITIES more

Financial incentives for stronger growth
BUOYANT CITIES more

A new approach to cities in decline
STRUGGLING CITIES more


Have your say

Comment on the manifesto

Tell us what you think - or suggest an alternative policy

comments
Major Cities
Buoyant Cities
Struggling Cities

Share with colleagues

invite
Click here to pass this manifesto on

Download this manifesto

pdf download
Click for the PDF version